So I'd be better off keeping the core 2 duo instead of the quad? Is this still true? I ordered a q8400 to replace the e8400, it's a quad core, but each core runs at a lower clock. I did notice in the main post that ST only uses two threads. So kudos for not only adding features, but also actually making the software more efficient. The atom tablet did not run it back then at all. I'm impressed at the optimizations made since I first tried this out in 2015. The core 2 duo can handle it at 100%, mpx, delossifier and all.
I'm repeating myself to emphasize just how ridiculous this is (in a good way). but pretty much every preset works with those tweaks. I can run ST with CPU settings all the way down and without mpx. Stereo tool (admittedly barely) runs on an atom based tablet, and it's what's currently exclusively powering my low power fm project. I'm going to dedicate it to audio processing to replace an old atom tablet that is on its last legs. Worth noting that I just bought a $30 computer that has a core 2 duo in it, and stereo tool 9.11 runs like a champ on it.
If the noise clears up after registration, great. ST Stand Alone seems too run smooth with no issues other than the static sound. My Mac is too old to upgrade to OS X 10.12 and can't afford to upgrade and ST is not recognized by OS X 10.6.8. Wanted to put the laptop in between the mixer and line in for a better broadcast sound other than what I have available. My setup is Mac Pro OS X 10.6.8, Radiologik playing thru main line out to an analog mixer to mix music and mic and back into main line in to Nicecast fx panel and to stream server. HD Audio/Speakers Sound Card: IDT 92HD87B1/3 IEC958 ST routes correctly and makes the beep and or cuts out but the static can be mild to bad. It may be due to trying ST before purchase but i'm getting a ton of static no matter what my source is going to the line in. I'll be running a stand alone setup using my laptop and Linux Mint 18.
0 kommentar(er)
